Heavenly Heartburn

Entries from February 2007

Squeezing One In

February 24, 2007 · 11 Comments

   I really am sorry for the lack of posting the last few days. I had fully intended to follow up on the previous post much sooner.

   We had a death in the family this past week and our family has been spending some time together around that. I have sandwiched several committee meetings and a concert in between that and homeschooling. Two basketball games, an RA Derby, and spending time with my wife’s family who is in town for a visit have kept me busy up until this point.

    Tomorrow, we have our normal church schedule with an ordination service at another church tomorrow afternoon. Monday I have to go to Madison, FL, for a funeral, then come back to Bainbridge, GA, that evening to teach my class. Tuesday morning my dad and I are traveling to Atlanta to attend our GBC State Evangelism Conference where I am looking forward to hearing Ergun Caner, Johnny Hunt and David Jeremiah among others. We are supposed to return home Wednesday.

    I said all that to say this, it will probably be Wednesday or later before I get to post again. I hope to post on the conference as well as the next article on Christian Statesmanship at that time.

    In the meantime, I pray that God’s grace and peace will be upon all of you.

Categories: Church · Evangelism · Family · Life in general

The Art of Christian Statesmanship–Part 1

February 21, 2007 · 22 Comments

   From time to time, I have posted on this blog about gracious speech. Christians are called upon by God to use speech that is filled with grace and ministers edification to the hearer. I would like to take that thought a little further and apply the principles of grace to methods that we sometimes see employed in theological debates, particularly on the internet.

    Let me say up front that I am exploring these ideas as a learner, not a master. I have been tempted, at times, to use every underhanded tactic that I am about to describe. I am ashamed to say that there have been times when I have stooped to using some of them in one form or another. I have been doing a lot of praying and thinking about this topic, though, and am trying to set a higher standard for myself. I want to share it with you. In this post, I want to point out some of the unsavory methods that I have seen used in theological debates. In the next in this series, I will propose some positive methods to which I am going to try to hold myself to following.

   I titled this post, “The Art of Christian Statesmanship,” because of the implications of the phrase, “Christian statesmanship”. Statesmanship is the art of diplomacy. I would like for us, for the sake of this conversation, to view debate as a diplomatic endeavor.

   Debate can be a very healthy thing. Debate can cause us to re-examine our theology, thus giving us opportunity to see where we may be wrong, or further solidifying our grasp on truth. Debate can broaden our understanding of the way others think. We can be exposed to ideas, concepts, and tenets that we previously were not aware of. Debate can clear up misconceptions that one may have about another’s position.

   Debate can be a healthy thing, it can also turn ugly. 

   What I am about to share is hardly earth-shattering news. If you have been involved with, or simply observed many theological debates in bloggyland, you have more than likely seen some of the things I am about to describe.

   In its simplest and purest form, debate should be a dialogue between opposing points of view. It should consist of one side presenting its own perspective, allowing the other side to present their perspective, and then perhaps each side responding with further information about their own position or questioning the validity of the opponent’s position (not the opponent’s intelligence, etc.). I call this “statesmanship” because it should be an exercise in diplomacy. I call it “Christian statesmanship” because above all it should be carried out in a manner that reflects the grace of Christ.

   Here are some tactics that I feel have no place in Christian debate:

  1. Allowing debates to devolve into a series of personal attacks. Name-calling and character assassination do not minister grace to the hearer.
  2. The use of “straw men.” This is a deliberate attempt to misrepresent an opponents position for the purpose of making their position look ridiculous.
  3. Attempting to align an opponent’s view with another view that is heretical without a clear line of connection. It is not unusual for various theological camps to share some common ground and even common terminology. The fact that they do so does not mean that they are in line with each other. Those who resort to this tactic should be careful, it is likely that their own position could be connected in this manner to a doctrine that they find revolting.
  4. Ridicule, sarcasm and generally rude behavior. Making fun of someone who holds a differing point of view does not minister grace. I have heard it argued that men of God (including Jesus) used sarcasm at times to make their point. I would say that there is a significant difference between Elijah using sarcasm against the prophets of Baal, Jesus using sarcasm against the Pharisees, and us using it against a brother or sister in Christ who has an opinion (or even a conviction) that differs from our own. I have yet to see any of these tactics used in a positive way in contemporary debates.
  5. Using a difference of opinion as a basis for judging.This is perhaps the most reprehensible of all tactics. When we allow our distaste for someone’s pet doctrine to cause us to question their love for God or their salvation, we should immediately step back and examine our own heart. I am not speaking about differences in religions, I am speaking about brothers and sisters in Christ who may interpret a particular Scripture text differently than we do.

   This list is not exhaustive, but it certainly covers many areas which Christians should avoid in our debates. Hopefully, in the next post we will take a look at some positive methods of discussion.

   Until then, be filled with the grace and peace of God.

  

Categories: Christian living · Philosophy · Theology · fellowship · grace

Music Interview: Steve Sensenig

February 17, 2007 · 13 Comments

   Regular visitors here are doubtless familiar with Steve Sensenig of Theological Musings. Over the past year, Steve has become a good friend. We have enjoyed some invigorating and challenging exchanges on a number of theological topics.

    In addition to being a student of the Bible, Steve is also a very talented musician. I had heard Steve’s Christmas CD and then last December enjoyed the opportunity to hear Steve play in person as he and his dear wife, Christy, ministered to Pine Park Baptist Church.

   Steve graciously agreed to this interview and this will be the first in what I hope will be a regular series of interviews with Christian musicians.

HH:  Tell us a little about your childhood and upbringing.

Steve: I was born in 1969 in Coatesville, PA.  I was the fourth of four children, and the only boy.  I was raised in a home that emphasized church attendance and daily family devotions. My father was (still is) a truck driver, although he rarely was gone over-the-road.  He always tried to have jobs that allowed him to be home each night.  My mother was an elementary school teacher, although for most of my childhood, she did not work fulltime.
 

HH:  When did you first develop an interest in music?

Steve: Quite honestly, I don’t remember the start of my interest in music.  It has always been a part of my life.  My mother is a musician, and each of my three older sisters were involved in music, as well, so it was a very natural interest for me.  Some of my earliest childhood memories involve coming home from church, going to the piano, and picking out the melodies that we sang that morning.

There also was a lot of quality recorded music to listen to in my home growing up.  My mother loves classical music, and introduced me to it as a very young child.  We had one of those old record players that held 10 records at a time, and I would lay in front of it for hours on end, listening to lots and lots of classical music.
 

HH:  How did you develop your ability?

Steve: Because my mother is a pianist (she was the regular church pianist when I was a child), and my two oldest sisters had also taken piano lessons, there were lots of piano method books and other music books around the house when I came along.  I started learning to play at such a young age that I don’t even remember learning how to read music!  As long as I can remember, I’ve been reading music and playing the piano.

As a young child, I had a silly (and arrogant!) dream that one day I would be a famous pianist and be able to say that I never took lessons.  So, whenever my parents would ask me if I wanted to take piano lessons, I would say “no”.  With the help of my mother and older sisters, I basically was self-taught until the age of 11.  Somehow at that point, I had figured out that there was only so far I was going to be able to go on my own, and I asked my parents if I could get lessons.

By the point I started lessons at age 11, I was already playing quite a bit, but having a regular lesson and a teacher outside the home caused me to progress more than I would have on my own.  That first teacher (with whom I studied for two years) also introduced me to the concept of music theory.  I am very grateful for that, because I was able to learn in my pre-teen years what some college music students struggle to learn!  That foundation in theory really helped me advance even more during my high school years.

All in all, I studied with four different piano teachers prior to going off to college.
 

HH:  What were some of the early influences on your music?

Steve: In terms of classical music, I quickly fell in love with Mozart and Beethoven as composers.  But in terms of hymns, etc., my upbringing in a traditional church (were there any other kinds when we were kids?) introduced me to many of the classic hymns.  As a young boy (about 7 years old, I think), I had the chance to hear Dino Kartsonakis in concert.  That was a huge influence on me, because he was the only pianist I was really familiar with who played hymn arrangements.

After the concert, I met Dino and got his autograph.  I said to him, “Someday I hope to be able to play the piano like you.”  He smiled and said, “You will.”  As a young boy, that really influenced me.  I don’t know if Dino was being prophetic, or just being kind, but in my young heart, I took it very seriously and for many years remembered that assurance that he had given me.  It was fitting, then, that when I made my first recording at age 18, I included one of Dino’s arrangements on that recording.

As a teenager, I started listening to George Winston, and his style of playing has definitely had an influence on my current style.  Other pianists have been similar to him, as well, and I have followed in their footsteps stylistically.
 

HH:  Your talent has taken you to a lot of places and made a lot of opportunities possible for you. Can you tell us about some of your favorites?

Steve: Wow.  This is a tough question.  I have definitely been blessed in this area.  I would like to preface my comments on this, however, by pointing out the old adage that all that glitters is not gold.  Some of what would seem to be great opportunities on the outside were not such pleasant opportunities behind the scenes for various reasons.

However, having said that, there are several memories that I am fond of.  One is a trip I took with several other college students in 1992 to Ukraine.  Communism had recently lost its hold in the former Soviet Union, and there was an incredible openness to the message of Jesus there.  We had the opportunity to sing several hymns and other songs translated into the Russian language.  We would stand in front of crowds on the streets and ask them, “Did you ever dream that one day an American would stand here in your country and tell you about Jesus?”  Tears would stream down their faces.  It was powerful!

More recent experiences that have been positive have been opportunities to play with Phillips, Craig, and Dean.  A few years back, they called me to play on their live DVD, filmed up in Virginia Beach, VA.  While the process of recording and filming is far from worshipful at times, I thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to play “When God Ran” live with them in that recording.
 

HH: Where would you like for your music to take you in the future?

Steve: This is a tough question to answer because the honest answer is “wherever God wants me to be”.  I have dreams of my own, but only want them to be fulfilled if it honors God.

I would love to play with other groups like Phillips, Craig, and Dean if the opportunity arose.  But in terms of my own music, I have a dream of one day being able to compose the score for a major motion picture.  I think that would be an incredibly challenging, but quite enjoyable opportunity.
 

HH:  If you could have a jam session with any composer/musician from any time in history, who would it be?

Steve: Ohhhhhhh, so many here.  Obviously, some of the big names in classical music come to mind — Beethoven, Brahms…  But I also like a wide variety of styles of music, and would love to jam with Pat Metheny (jazz), Larry Carlton (also jazz), or Michael W. Smith, to name a few.
 

HH:  What advice would you give to an aspiring musician?

Steve: Well, the first thing I would say is that it is very important to learn to understand your talent and craft.  By that, I mean, don’t take the shortcut to temporary success at the expense of becoming deeply intimate with the musical talent within you.

Today’s technology allows lots of people to be “musicians” who honestly don’t even understand what it is they are doing.  I love technology, and embrace much of it.  But the technology works best when it is a supplement to actual craft, not a substitute for it.

With music, that means that I place a huge emphasis on a knowledge of music theory and a variety of musical forms.  My son is getting very good at the guitar, and really enjoys playing a rock style of guitar.  I have no problem with that (most of the time!), but have also encouraged him to learn how music works in theory and to listen to other styles of music, as well.

It is also important, in my opinion, for a musician to be self-motivated to learn.  In this regard, I often discourage parents from insisting that their kids take lessons and practice.  If it doesn’t come from a desire within the child, it probably won’t be successful!  I am very grateful for parents who understood this and allowed me to develop my own heart and passion for music without it being forced on me.
 

HH:  Your music carries with it a certain pathos or emotion. Even though it is instrumental, the message of the song still seems to come through. Is this something of which you are conscious when you are playing or is it just a result of the passion with which you play?

Steve: Am I conscious of it?  Yes and no.  You have described very beautifully what I try to convey, though, and I’m encouraged that it is coming across in that way!  About 90% of what I play in concerts and recordings (at this present stage I’m in) is improvisatory.  I rarely know where the music will go.  This results in some very interesting things from a musical standpoint, such as unconventional chord progressions (and structures) and uneven meters.  I don’t consciously think in those terms, but that’s what comes out.

Sometimes when I listen to what I’ve recorded, I’m surprised at what I hear!  But I view my playing much in the way I imagine a painter views their painting.  There is an intangible “heart element” that drives the creation of the art.  I have a “palette” — a musical vocabulary, if you will — from which I draw in my musical “painting”, and I choose “colors” that fit the song that I’m playing.  It may mean that I’ll camp out on a certain chord or phrase in a hymn for a while, shading it and coloring it in different ways before moving on.  Sometimes this is the result of a conscious awareness of the lyrics at that point, and sometimes it’s merely a sub-conscious choice at the time to bring something out.
 

HH:  I appreciate you taking the time to answer these questions. Why don’t you tell us a little bit about your website and your recordings?

Steve: Worship Keys (http://www.worshipkeys.com) is a site that I’ve put together to introduce my music to people and share a bit of my heart.  For me, worship is so much more than just music, and I try to convey that on the website.  The name “Worship Keys” is intentionally flexible in meaning.  It refers to keys on a piano, since I’m primarily a pianist, but also is meant to coincide with my desire to help people see different keys (important elements) in worship.

I have three CDs currently available (and a new one in process).  The first one, “To Worship You”, contains modern praise and worship songs, but played in the intimate styling that is currently my “trademark”.  Even songs that usually are more loud, such as “Shout to the Lord”, are brought into a very intimate interpretation.  One of my favorite tracks on that CD is the last track, called “Ivory Worship”, which is a 16-minute free-flowing improvised worship without any pre-existing melody or song in mind.  It is me just sitting down at the piano and playing from my heart.

The second CD is called “‘Tis So Sweet” and taps into the rich heritage of hymns from my youth.  This CD is presented as a continuous flow from one song to the next.  This was another way in which I was influenced by Dino from my youth.  He once did a record that flowed from one song to the next in continuous worship.  Of course, back then, it was only about 20 minutes per side of an LP, but the idea captured my attention.  On “‘Tis So Sweet”, I literally just sat down at the piano with a list of possible hymns, hit record, and began playing.  As I would near the end of a particular hymn, I would look at the list and pick another one, and flow right into it.  The result is about 62 minutes of non-stop music (although indexed by hymn as separate tracks on the CD, there is no pause between them).  During the recording process, I did actually stop two or three times to rest (and to click “Save” on the computer, so I wouldn’t lose what I had played!), but I always did it by leading up to a cadence that I then picked up from when starting to record again, so as not to break the flow of the music.

My most recent CD is “Christmas Solitude”.  As I explain in the liner notes of that CD, I intentionally chose Christmas songs that focused on Jesus and avoided the more generic “holiday” songs.  I wanted this Christmas CD to be a worship experience focused strictly on our Savior.  An added delight on this CD is a song written and sung by my beautiful wife Christy.  This track, a lullaby sung from Mary’s perspective, is a wonderful vocal oasis in the middle of all of the instrumental music.

Categories: Christian living · Culture · Interviews · Music

Happy Valentine’s Day!

February 14, 2007 · 4 Comments

I want to wish each of you a happy Valentine’s Day. I hope that you share your love with all of the special people in your life.

 Most of all, I hope that you share the love of Christ.

Categories: Life in general

Taking Responsibility

February 12, 2007 · 17 Comments

This weekend has flown by. I had wanted to post on two or three occasions in the last few days but just could not find the time.

I would like to speak to something that is sort of a follow-up on the joke I wrote last week about biblical ignorance in the church.

I think that one glaring weakness among Christians is a lack of knowledge where scripture is concerned. They have Bibles, they may even bring them to church, they would claim to revere the Word of God, yet they do not know it. I realize this is hardly an earth-shattering revelation, but it is the source of a lot of problems in the church.

A former pastor of mine used to tell the story of the lady who argued the Bible with him, swearing up and down that the Bible says that, “Every tub must stand on its own bottom.”

For some reason, many Christians have adopted the notion that they can get enough Bible while sitting in church or Sunday School to suffice for their spiritual growth. They place the entire responsibility for their maturity on the shoulders of a pastor, elder or teacher.

In some discussions relating to this matter, I have heard the opinions of some who have suggested that this is the pastor’s fault. I have, personally, never known a pastor who has told his people that they were to rely on him for their spiritual growth. I would say that any “pastor” who does such a thing is no pastor at all, but a cult leader. I have known, however, many pastors who tried to encourage their flocks to take personal responsibility for their growth.

I Peter 2:2 tells us that as newborn babes, we should desire the “sincere milk of the word”. That is, every believer needs to have a hunger for the word of God. We should have a desire to grow that stems from our “spiritual DNA” as children of God. As members one of another in the body of Christ, we have a responsibility to one another to grow. Above all, we should seek to glorify Christ in lives that are transformed by the power of His word.

I have nothing against books, study courses, seminars, conferences, etc. I partake of all of them at any opportunity that I have to do so, but none of these will ever replace the spiritually nutritional benefit of scripture. A Christian cannot grow apart from God’s Word.

How hungry are you?

Categories: Christian living · Church · Theology

An Oldie Goldie

February 7, 2007 · 18 Comments

A pastor who had just recently come to a new church was visiting each Sunday School class by turn to get better acquainted with his members.

One Sunday, he was visiting the Junior Boys’ class and the teacher invited him to ask the class a Bible question. He asked them, “Who tore down the walls of Jericho?” After a moment of awkward silence he fixed his gaze on a bright-looking lad in hopes that the boy would come up with the right answer.

The boy said, “Don’t look at me, Preacher, I didn’t do it.”

The pastor looked at the teacher with a quizzical expression on his face. The teacher said, “Pastor, I have known this boy his whole life. If he said he didn’t do it, I believe him.”

The concerned preacher went to the Sunday School director and apprised him of the situation. “Pastor,” replied the director, “I have the utmost confidence in that teacher. If she is willing to stand behind that boy, then so am I.”

Realizing that he was being faced with a real problem of biblical ignorance in the Sunday School staff, the preacher called an emergency meeting with his deacons in which he told them the details of what had happened.

After a moments pause, the chairman of the deacons said, “Preacher, I don’t think this is going to be a problem. We should just get an estimate on the damage and then take up an offering to pay for it.”

Categories: Church · Humor

Is Loving Christ the First Love of the Church?

February 5, 2007 · 10 Comments

I want to write a follow-up to the post I wrote last week on what I believe to be the source and solution of the problems in the church. I want to say again how much I appreciate everyone who participated in the discussion and particularly the grace with which you did.

In the discussion that followed the post, we began to look at what is involved in worship and whether or not the “first love” of the church is actually love for Jesus. Some very good ideas and arguments were presented from a variety of viewpoints.

I think we can all agree that love for God and love for the brethren are inseparably linked. I think the question that remains is, are they one and the same?

While the two are closely linked, I believe there is a distinction between loving God and loving people. I listed several reasons why I believe this in one of my comments, let me briefly reiterate some of those reasons now.

1.  It is possible for unbelievers to have a degree of love for one another, but I believe that only believers can love one another in the way that God has prescribed. Thus, a relationship with God is a pre-requisite for loving the brethren.

2.  When asked about the Great Commandment (Matt. 22:35-39), Jesus first named loving God, then listed loving the brethren. He even made a distinction between the two, calling the one the “first and great commandment” and the other “the second”.

3.  In John 15, Jesus spoke of His disciples loving Him first, then gave the commandment to love each other.

4.  In I John 1, John begins the epistle (which many think was written to the Ephesian church) by describing his close relationship with Christ, then expressing his desire to fellowship with others based upon that relationship.

Now having given those reasons, let me say that our love for Christ will not be fulfilled until we love the brethren. I would never want to discount our love for one another. Those who have read my series of posts on I John from last year will know the value that I place upon koinonia and agape. But love begins with our love for Christ.

It is only when I am walking in love with Christ that I will be able to love the brethren in the way that God wants me to love. I think we could describe this as vertical love/fellowship and horizontal love/fellowship. The vertical, of course, is our relationship with Christ while the horizontal is our relationship with others.

We could illustrate this concept by comparing it to the crosshairs of a rifle scope. Ideally, when aiming a scope, the vertical crosshairs need to be straight up and down which by default causes the horizontal crosshairs to be properly aligned. When the crosshairs are properly lined up, the target will be hit. I learned this lesson the hard way last deer season when I missed a nice buck trying to shoot it from a cock-eyed angle.

When my love for Christ (vertical) is properly aligned, it will cause my love for the brethren (horizontal) to be properly aligned as well. In this way, they are inseparably linked, yet the focus is on Christ. When both are properly aligned, we will hit the target of glorifying Christ in the church.

Categories: Church · I John · Theology · Worship · fellowship

News Blooper

February 5, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I want to post a follow-up article on the church a little later today or tomorrow, but I am a little pressed for time right now. Until then, maybe you will get a chuckle out of this.

 Last night, after the Super Bowl, my wife and I were watching the local news. The anchor made this statement,
“Shots were heard at a local apartment complex, today. Authorities say they may have been related to guns”.

She then corrected herself, changing “guns” to “gangs”, but by then it was too late, my wife and I were already falling out of our chair with laughter.

Categories: Culture · Humor · Life in general

Guy’s Day Out

February 3, 2007 · 9 Comments

My wife, Amy, has been out of town for the last couple of days at a retreat for minister’s wives in Stone Mountain, GA. This is an annual event that she attends.

Hoping to avoid what happened last year while she was gone, I decided to take my two sons on a hike at St. Mark’s National Wildlife Refuge in St. Marks, FL. We were joined by my dad.

 We had an absolutely awesome time. This time of year there is a wide variety of birds wintering in the refuge. Among others, we saw two bald eagles, great blue herons, tri-colored herons, black-crowned night heron, wood stork, double-crested cormorant, and a variety of ducks. We also saw deer, several large alligators and an otter.

It was great to get out in the outdoors and see the beauty (my header picture was taken at St. Marks), have a picnic lunch on the side of the trail and enjoy some good company.

I just wanted to share it with you. I hope you have a great weekend.

Categories: Family · Life in general · Outdoors